Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces DT-Guard, a novel safety guardrail model for large language models that balances efficiency and robustness by utilizing a Reasoning-Active Training, Reasoning-Free Inference approach. By formulating safety judgments as a progressive decision process and employing Rollout-Guided Progressive Hard-Case Optimization, DT-Guard effectively identifies and addresses complex risks while maintaining low-latency performance. Experimental results reveal that DT-Guard achieves superior safety classification accuracy compared to larger baseline models, demonstrating the potential of internalizing reasoning supervision for enhanced safety in real-time applications.
DT-Guard outperforms larger models in safety classification while maintaining low-latency performance, proving that reasoning supervision can be efficiently internalized.
Large language models deployed in open-world applications require safety guardrails that are both robust to complex risks and efficient enough for low-latency runtime moderation. Existing guardrails face a practical trade-off between lightweight classification-based models, which are efficient but often struggle with concealed intent, ambiguous semantics, and borderline safety decisions, and reasoning-based guards, which improve judgment quality but introduce additional token generation and inference latency. We present DT-Guard, a content safety guardrail model based on a Reasoning-Active Training, Reasoning-Free Inference paradigm. The key idea is to use reasoning supervision during training while emitting only structured safety labels at inference time. DT-Guard formulates safety judgment as a progressive decision process, Intent - Category - Safety, and constructs an intent-driven dataset with intent labels, risk categories, safety labels, and structured reasoning trajectories. To further improve hard-case robustness, we propose Rollout-Guided Progressive Hard-Case Optimization (RG-PHO), which uses multi-rollout consistency to identify stably mastered, persistently failed, and preference-unstable samples, and applies targeted supervised and preference optimization accordingly. At inference time, DT-Guard directly generates structured labels without explicit reasoning traces, preserving deployment efficiency. Experiments on prompt-side and response-side safety benchmarks show that DT-Guard achieves average F1 scores of 0.886 and 0.870, respectively. With only a 4B backbone, it reaches a dual-side average F1 of 0.878, outperforming strong 8B guardrail baselines. These results demonstrate that reasoning supervision can be effectively internalized into low-latency safety discrimination.
