Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study audits restaurant recommendations from three major large language models (LLMs) across 304 neighborhoods in five U.S. cities, utilizing 320 synthetic user profiles that vary by income, age, sex, and residential status. The findings reveal that LLMs not only fabricate venues in areas with weaker digital footprints but also systematically overlook real establishments, with 47.5% of venues never recommended and 31.9% of these blind spots being consistent across all model families. The research highlights how these biases in visibility can redirect consumer demand and revenue, potentially exacerbating urban inequality and affecting local economies.
LLMs are reshaping urban discovery by fabricating venues and ignoring real ones, leading to significant economic implications for local communities.
Large language models (LLMs) are emerging as a new informational layer over cities, shaping which places people discover, consider, and ultimately visit. Yet little is known about which places they surface, which they ignore, and whether these patterns vary across communities and users and translate into real-world economic consequences. Here, we audit restaurant recommendations from three major LLMs across 304 neighborhoods in five U.S. cities using 320 synthetic user profiles spanning income, age, sex, and residential status. We find that LLMs both fabricate venues and systematically overlook real ones. Fabrication is concentrated in neighborhoods with weaker digital and physical footprints and disappears when models are provided with verified venue lists. In contrast, invisibility persists: even when choosing from a fixed set of real venues, 47.5% of establishments are never recommended, and 31.9% of these blind spots are shared across all three model families, indicating that uneven visibility reflects not only missing knowledge but also stable patterns of selective attention rooted in shared patterns of visibility rather than model-specific errors. The same selectivity extends to users. Within identical venue pools, higher-income users receive more expensive and less popular venues, while tourists are directed toward costlier but more socially diverse establishments than local residents. Simulating the resulting shifts in consumer demand suggests that widespread reliance on LLM recommendations would redirect visits and revenue away from chain and quick-service restaurants toward independent and full-service dining. Together, our findings show that LLMs act as a selective layer of urban information that unevenly distributes visibility across places and people, with potential consequences for local economies and urban inequality.
