Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the generalization capabilities of parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) in quantum reinforcement learning through a PAC-Bayesian lens, revealing that generalization is influenced more by the effective dimension of the Fisher geometry than by the number of parameters alone. The authors demonstrate that increased entanglement leads to larger train-test gaps, indicating that entangled circuits generalize worse than their non-entangled counterparts with the same parameter count. Their findings challenge traditional views on circuit complexity by establishing entanglement as a critical axis affecting generalization performance across various quantum learning tasks.
Entangled quantum circuits can significantly hinder generalization, leading to worse performance than non-entangled circuits with the same number of parameters.
Parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) are increasingly used as policies and value functions in quantum reinforcement learning, yet it remains unclear when and why quantum policies generalize. We give a PAC-Bayesian account in which generalization is governed not by the raw number of circuit parameters, but by the effective dimension of the Fisher geometry induced by the circuit. This quantity is inflated by entanglement, making entangling connectivity an independent axis of complexity.In controlled experiments that fix the number of trainable rotations and vary only entanglement, we find that circuits with larger Fisher effective dimension exhibit larger train-test gaps, while parameter count is a weak predictor. The resulting bound acts primarily as a ranking certificate: it correctly orders circuits with identical parameter count, which parameter-counting bounds cannot do. We validate this mechanism across supervised classification, quantum contextual bandits, and value-function generalization, where entangled circuits consistently generalize worse than non-entangled circuits of equal parameter count, with gaps shrinking as sample size increases.Our strongest evidence comes from low-variance decision models, including single-observable classifiers, value heads, and one-step policies. In end-to-end multi-step policy learning, entanglement effects remain statistically significant but high return variance leaves the full ordering only partially resolved. Partial-correlation analysis shows that Fisher effective dimension screens off entangling pattern, and controls for training accuracy, readout, and optimizer rule out major optimization confounders. The effect also persists on an IBM Heron quantum processor under real noise. Overall, our results reframe quantum policy design around an entanglement--generalization trade-off rather than expressivity alone.
