Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the impact of reward function design in reinforcement learning (RL) for generating BPMN process models from natural language using large language models (LLMs). By systematically training two LLM families under 48 configurations with Group Sequence Policy Optimization and a comprehensive evaluation framework, the authors reveal that RL significantly enhances pragmatic and syntactic quality while maintaining semantic fidelity. Notably, they find that equal reward weighting consistently outperforms targeted weighting, and that design choices interact with model architecture in complex ways, underscoring the critical role of reward composition in optimization outcomes.
Reward function design can make or break the quality of LLM-generated process models, with equal weighting proving more effective than targeted approaches.
Large language models (LLMs) can generate BPMN process models from natural-language descriptions, yet supervised fine-tuning (SFT) limits their output quality to the patterns present in the training data. Reinforcement learning (RL) can optimize beyond this ceiling using external quality measures, but how the reward function should be designed when quality is multi-dimensional remains unexplored. We present a systematic investigation of reward function design for RL-based process model generation, training two LLM families (Llama~3.1 8B, Qwen~2.5 14B) under 48 configurations using Group Sequence Policy Optimization with rewards derived from an automated evaluation framework comprising 38 metrics across syntactic, pragmatic, and semantic quality. Three findings emerge. First, RL significantly improves pragmatic and syntactic quality while preserving semantic fidelity, reducing output variability by more than sixfold. Second, equal reward weighting consistently outperforms targeted weighting: emphasizing a specific dimension fails to improve it and can collapse the model into a low-quality mode. Third, design choices interact with model architecture in non-trivial ways: the invalidity penalty is essential for one model but irrelevant for the other, and SFT initialization is indispensable for one architecture but counterproductive for another. These results demonstrate that reward composition is a primary determinant of optimization outcomes, with effects as large as the decision to apply RL itself. The findings generalize to any structured generation task where quality is assessed along multiple automated dimensions. We release our implementation and experimental code at https://github.com/chlauer99/RL_for_process_modeling.
