Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates six different approaches to generating metadata for RDF datasets, focusing on their impact on retrieval effectiveness and faithfulness. The findings reveal that while unconstrained metadata rewriting significantly enhances retrieval performance, it compromises faithfulness, highlighting a tension between search improvements and semantic integrity. In contrast, more grounded methods, particularly profile-grounded rewriting, achieve a better balance between retrieval effectiveness and faithfulness, suggesting a nuanced approach to synthetic metadata generation in information retrieval systems.
Unconstrained metadata rewriting boosts retrieval effectiveness but sacrifices faithfulness, revealing a critical trade-off in synthetic metadata generation.
Dataset search depends heavily on metadata, making LLM-generated metadata a consequential form of synthetic content in retrieval systems. We study six metadata-generation settings for RDF datasets, ranging from simple rewriting to profile-grounded and agentic graph-based generation, and evaluate them jointly for retrieval effectiveness and faithfulness. Unconstrained metadata rewriting delivers the strongest retrieval gains over the original metadata, but it is also the least faithful, showing that search improvements can be driven by unsupported semantic expansion. More grounded settings substantially improve faithfulness, and profile-grounded rewriting provides the most balanced trade-off between retrieval effectiveness and grounding. These findings position synthetic metadata as a system-level IR problem in which effectiveness, provenance, and trust must be evaluated together.
