Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a control-aware optimal trajectory planning framework for robotic manipulators that integrates manipulator dynamics and actuator effort into trajectory generation. By employing a midpoint linearization strategy, the authors enhance the accuracy of trajectory planning for large point-to-point motions, allowing for a fair evaluation of various planners under identical nonlinear execution conditions. The results from simulations on a simplified UR5 manipulator reveal that the proposed method significantly reduces tracking error and actuator effort compared to traditional kinematic approaches, highlighting the importance of considering dynamics in trajectory planning.
Kinematic smoothness alone fails to ensure efficient execution, as demonstrated by a new trajectory planning framework that cuts actuator effort and execution costs significantly.
Trajectory planning strongly influences tracking accuracy, actuator demand, and overall execution behavior in robotic manipulators. Classical planners such as cubic, quintic, and trapezoidal profiles are widely used for their simplicity and smoothness, yet they remain purely kinematic and ignore system dynamics and control effort during trajectory generation. As a result, nominally smooth trajectories can lead to inefficient nonlinear execution and increased corrective control action. This paper presents a control-aware optimal trajectory planning framework that explicitly incorporates manipulator dynamics and actuator effort within a finite-horizon formulation. A midpoint linearization strategy is introduced to improve approximation accuracy for large point-to-point motions. In contrast to prior comparisons, the proposed approach enables fair, isolated evaluation of trajectory generation effects under identical closed-loop nonlinear execution conditions. To this end, a unified evaluation framework is developed in which all planners are executed under identical nonlinear dynamics, controller structure, and actuator constraints. Simulations on a nonlinear simplified UR5 manipulator show that the proposed approach consistently reduces tracking error, corrective torque, and closed-loop execution cost compared to classical methods, achieving substantial reductions in actuator effort and execution cost across all evaluated scenarios, demonstrating that kinematic smoothness alone does not ensure dynamically efficient execution.
