Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of three loss functions鈥攁daptive categorical cross entropy (aCCE), marginal loss, and adaptive binary cross entropy (aBCE)鈥攆or robust echocardiography segmentation using partially labelled data from multiple domains. The experiments reveal that while all loss functions perform well in intra-domain tasks, aBCE and marginal loss excel in inter-domain scenarios, particularly when dealing with missing labels. Notably, marginal loss demonstrates superior robustness when multiple labels are absent, underscoring the critical role of loss function selection in optimizing segmentation performance.
Marginal loss outperforms other loss functions in complex echocardiography segmentation tasks with multiple missing labels, revealing a new frontier in handling partially labelled data.
Echocardiography is the first imaging modality used for assessing cardiac function, and accurate segmentation of cardiac structures is essential for deriving biomarkers. However, the development of effective automated segmentation models for multiple cardiac structures is challenged by the difficulty of training on datasets from different sources that are often partially-labelled. This study aims to address this challenge by evaluating the performance of three loss functions - adaptive categorical cross entropy (aCCE) loss, marginal loss, and the adaptive binary cross entropy (aBCE) loss - in handling partially-labelled data. We conduct a comprehensive comparison of these loss functions across multiple scenarios and network architectures: intra-domain and inter-domain tasks, with both single and multiple partial-labels, and varying proportions of fully-labelled to partially-labelled data. Our experiments reveal that all three loss functions exhibit strong performance in intra-domain segmentation tasks, effectively handling label variations within the same domain. For inter-domain tasks, where models are trained on datasets with a domain shift, the aBCE and marginal losses show superior performance when dealing with the case of one label being missing from some training examples. In scenarios involving more than one label being missing, marginal loss outperforms the other methods, demonstrating its robustness in such complex conditions. These results highlight the strengths of each loss function depending on the labelling scenario, emphasizing the importance of selecting the appropriate loss function to optimize model performance. This study represents the first investigation of techniques for handling partially-labelled data from multiple different domains in echocardiography segmentation and provides a comprehensive comparison of loss-based solutions.
