Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates fixed-step gradient descent as a discrete dynamical system, revealing how it influences the training dynamics of deep learning models. By analyzing a balanced scalar reduction of a deep linear chain, the authors demonstrate that the edge of stability marks the first bifurcation of the training map, rather than a failure in optimization. The findings show that finite-step oscillations not only affect parameter movement towards flatter representations but also redefine the learning rate as a structural parameter that shapes the dynamics and outcomes of gradient descent.
The learning rate is redefined as a structural parameter of training dynamics, fundamentally shaping the representations selected by gradient descent.
Many phenomena of deep learning are dynamical: they concern not only which minima exist, but how gradient descent reaches, avoids, or selects among them. Edge-of-stability behavior, sharpness oscillations, catapult phases, balancing, and movement toward flatter representations are effects of the training map itself, and are poorly captured by the small-step gradient-flow limit. This paper studies fixed-step gradient descent as a discrete dynamical system in a hierarchy of exactly solvable models retaining basic structures of deep learning: depth, factorization, width, data coupling, activation, and stochasticity. The starting point is the balanced scalar reduction of a deep linear chain, giving a quartic loss and a cubic gradient map whose post-edge behavior is explicit. Under the natural large-depth scaling, this dynamics converges to a universal Ricker-type map. The edge of stability is therefore not a breakdown of optimization, but the first bifurcation of the training map. Embedding the scalar dynamics back into factored models turns these regimes into learning phenomena. Finite steps break conservation laws of gradient flow and contract factorization imbalance; residual oscillations move parameters toward flatter, more balanced representations. Wider linear networks produce a ladder of spectral edges, so the optimal learning rate can lie beyond the first edge. Data coupling, nonlinear activations, and stochastic targets preserve the same organizing principle: finite-step oscillations drive alignment, balancing, and representation selection. Thus the learning rate is not merely a numerical stability parameter. It is a structural parameter of the training dynamics, determining its attractors and shaping the representations gradient descent selects.
ETH