Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces HamQASBench, a novel benchmark for Quantum Architecture Search (QAS) that organizes quantum circuits based on Hamiltonian structure rather than traditional metrics like molecular identity or qubit count. By employing Hamiltonian-informed fingerprints and a critical-structure extraction procedure, the benchmark reveals hidden failure modes in QAS methods that conventional energy-based evaluations overlook. The results highlight significant issues such as over-parameterization and representation bottlenecks, underscoring the need for more nuanced evaluation frameworks in quantum circuit design.
Conventional benchmarks miss critical structural failures in quantum circuit design, but HamQASBench exposes hidden pitfalls that could derail QAS efforts.
Quantum Architecture Search (QAS) automates the design of parameterized quantum circuits for variational quantum algorithms, yet existing benchmarks organize instances by molecular identity or qubit count -- criteria agnostic to Hamiltonian structure -- and rely solely on energy accuracy, which cannot detect structural failures such as over-parameterization on near-product ground states. We introduce HamQASBench, a Hamiltonian-informed diagnostic benchmark organizing 11 molecules into five structural tiers via fingerprints derived from the Pauli operator basis, computational basis representation, and ground-state entanglement. A post-hoc critical-structure extraction procedure identifies minimal circuits consistent with each tier's requirements, complementing energy-based evaluation with per-qubit entanglement analysis and pairwise state fidelity. Benchmarking five QAS methods across four paradigms reveals failure modes invisible to conventional metrics: over-parameterization in the minimalism regime, eigenstate commitment under degeneracy, a representation bottleneck in strongly correlated systems, topology-induced routing failure, and circuit search space growth as a scalability bottleneck.
