Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces a novel approach to handling label ambiguity in IMU-based exercise evaluation by generating a label distribution for each repetition rather than relying on one-hot encoding. By training a neural network with a Kullback-Leibler objective, the authors demonstrate that their ambiguity approach not only improves classification performance across four datasets but also enhances the detection of ambiguous repetitions and their relevant classes. The findings indicate that incorporating label distributions provides additional information without compromising classification accuracy, addressing a critical gap in automated movement assessment.
Classifying exercise repetitions with label distributions reveals ambiguity that traditional one-hot methods overlook, leading to more accurate assessments in home-based physiotherapy.
Home-based physiotherapy is performed without supervision, which leads to incorrect execution and motivates systems that assess movement automatically from inertial measurement units (IMUs). Such systems assign each repetition to a category, yet a relevant share of repetitions falls near a class boundary, where even trained raters disagree. Classifiers trained with one-hot labels collapse these borderline repetitions onto a single class and discard this ambiguity. We address this with a method that automatically generates a label distribution per repetition without a large rater pool. We train a network to reproduce the full distribution with a Kullback-Leibler objective, the ambiguity approach, and compare it against a one-hot cross-entropy baseline on four IMU exercise datasets. From the network output we further determine whether a repetition is ambiguous and which classes are relevant to it. The ambiguity approach matched or exceeded the baseline classification on all four datasets, and detected ambiguity and the relevant classes more reliably. Representing the label distribution in the training target therefore adds information about ambiguity at no cost to classification.
