Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Tsinghua AIand Space AdministrationNTUSouthern Methodist UniversityUT AustinJul 6, 2026arXiv:2607.04673This paper introduces GlaKG, a biomarker-centric fundus knowledge graph designed to enhance the interpretability of glaucoma diagnosis and risk assessment by integrating structural biomarkers and clinically grounded rules. By employing a post-processing fusion framework that combines deep learning embeddings with knowledge graph reasoning, GlaKG achieves an impressive F1 score of 0.9953 for binary classification and 0.930 accuracy for four-class risk stratification on a publicly available dataset. The model not only provides high predictive performance but also offers traceable reasoning for its predictions, making it a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in ophthalmology.
GlaKG achieves near-perfect classification while providing a transparent reasoning framework that links biomarker evidence to clinical rules, addressing the black-box nature of traditional deep learning models in healthcare.
Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, yet most automated diagnosis systems rely on opaque deep-learning models that offer little clinical interpretability. We present GlaKG, a biomarker-centric fundus knowledge graph that integrates structural biomarkers, clinically grounded rules, and image features to produce traceable reasoning for glaucoma diagnosis and risk stratification. GlaKG encodes six entity types (Fundus Image, Optic Disc, Neural Rim, Pathology, Diagnosis, Risk Level), eight relation types, and 11 clinically validated rules into a unified graph, so that every prediction is accompanied by an explicit reasoning chain linking biomarker evidence to activated clinical rules. To keep knowledge-based reasoning strictly separate from label information, we adopt a post-processing fusion framework that combines ResNet50 image embeddings with a normalized KG reasoning-chain score via a tunable weight alpha, with all fitting confined to the training split. On a publicly available, AI-annotated fundus dataset, GlaKG reaches F1 = 0.9953 for binary glaucoma classification and 0.930 accuracy with 0.922 weighted F1 for four-class risk stratification; we report openly that the dataset's biomarker annotations are highly label-correlated, and therefore frame these figures as an upper bound attainable with clean structured biomarkers rather than as leakage-free image-only performance. Feature-importance analysis shows KG-derived and biomarker features contributing near-equally (51.1% vs. 48.9%), and the reasoning chain flags borderline cases by exposing low chain scores rather than failing silently. GlaKG's central contribution is therefore a clinically auditable reasoning framework that complements raw predictive performance by explicitly exposing the biomarker evidence and rule activations behind each decision.
