Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how the integration of conversational AI into information-seeking behaviors alters the structure of search episodes, revealing that these interactions can bifurcate into either brief, in-place answers or extended multi-step journeys. By analyzing real user interactions with major conversational assistants alongside their search and browsing patterns, the authors find that the likelihood of a search collapsing into a single query decreases with the length of the initial user request. Notably, while conversational AI enhances the information-seeking experience, it does not replace traditional search methods, with users frequently returning to search boxes even after engaging with AI assistants.
Conversational AI reshapes information-seeking episodes, leading to longer, more complex journeys rather than simply increasing search volume.
Classic models cast information seeking as iterative foraging: formulate a keyword query, scan results, reformulate, gather across sources, synthesize. We ask what happens when a conversational assistant is inserted into that episode. Linking real conversations with major assistants to the same users' searches and browsing in an opt-in cross-surface panel, and reconstructing the full episode rather than a single query, we find conversational AI changes the shape of information seeking, not merely its volume. AI episodes do not uniformly collapse; they bifurcate. Most terminate in place, with no onward search or content step in the observed trace, while roughly a third scaffold into longer multi-step journeys. Which shape occurs is governed less by task type than by articulation: collapse is statistically indistinguishable across lookup, learning, and comparison episodes, yet falls monotonically with opening-ask length, from 72% at one-to-three words to 48% beyond twenty. Roughly two-fifths of assistant episodes are workbench use--drafting, coding, editing--not information seeking at all, and these collapse most. Conversational AI also does not displace search: search remains woven through roughly three-quarters of within-episode transitions, after reading a page users return to the search box over the assistant 70/30, and within-user search share does not fall. Verification is rare: searches with explicit verification language follow roughly 1% of episodes, and citation-forward interfaces do not measurably increase checking. All of this is episode structure, a compositional object identifiable without a demand counterfactual. Conversational AI recomposes the seeking episode: it answers brief asks in place and anchors invested asks in longer journeys, adding a layer rather than replacing search.
