Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces EvoPolicyGym, a benchmark designed to evaluate Autonomous Policy Evolution by allowing agents to iteratively edit executable policies within a fixed interaction budget. This approach addresses the limitations of traditional evaluations that often reduce complex policy improvements to a single score. Results show that GPT-5.5 outperforms other models across 16 environments, highlighting the importance of budget allocation and feedback conversion in effective policy evolution.
GPT-5.5 not only tops the leaderboard in policy evolution but also reveals critical insights into how agents can optimize performance through strategic feedback utilization.
Autonomous agents are increasingly expected to improve executable policies through feedback, yet existing evaluations often collapse this process into a final score or confound it with open-ended software-engineering progress. We introduce Autonomous Policy Evolution, a controlled evaluation setting in which a harness-model agent repeatedly edits an executable policy system under a fixed interaction budget. We instantiate this setting in EvoPolicyGym, a benchmark built from compact interactive RL environments that evaluates how agents iteratively improve explored policies. On the EvoPolicyGym suite, GPT-5.5 achieves the strongest aggregate rank score and top-two performance on all 16 environments. Beyond leaderboard results, EvoPolicyGym also provides trajectory-level diagnostics that distinguish how agents allocate budget, convert feedback into parametric tuning. These analyses show that strong autonomous policy evolution depends not only on isolated task wins, but on discovering task-appropriate mechanisms and refining policies under bounded feedback.