Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces AgenticSTS, a bounded-memory testbed designed to evaluate long-horizon decision-making in LLM agents by utilizing a fresh user message for each decision, thereby isolating the effects of individual memory components. The authors apply this framework to the game Slay the Spire 2, revealing that while LLMs struggle with the task鈥攔eporting zero wins at the lowest difficulty鈥攕trategic skills can significantly enhance performance, with a no-store baseline winning 3 out of 10 games compared to 6 out of 10 when strategic skills are enabled. The findings highlight the importance of memory structure in shaping agent behavior over extended decision-making horizons, providing a reproducible methodology for future research in this area.
LLM agents can dramatically improve their long-horizon decision-making by strategically managing memory, with performance varying significantly based on memory structure.
Memory for a long-horizon LLM agent is a contract about what each future decision is allowed to see. The simplest contract appends past observations, tool calls, and reflections to every prompt, which makes prior context easy to access but also turns it into a jumbled mixture in which the effect of any single memory component is hard to isolate. We introduce and instrument an alternative bounded contract: every decision is made from a fresh user message assembled by typed retrieval, with no raw cross-decision transcript appended. The prompt thus stays bounded across runs of any length, and any single layer can be ablated in isolation. We instantiate the contract in Slay the Spire 2, a closed-rule stochastic deck-building game whose runs require hundreds of tactical and strategic decisions. A public online benchmark of frontier LLMs on the same game reports zero wins at the lowest difficulty across five configurations, and the developer-reported human win rate at the same difficulty is 16%; the task is hard but not saturated. Within our harness, a fixed-A0 ablation shows the largest observed difference when triggered strategic skills are enabled: the no-store baseline wins 3/10 games and adding the skill layer 6/10. At this sample size the comparison is directional rather than statistically decisive (Fisher exact p\approx0.37); a cross-backbone probe and public accumulating-context baselines are reported as operational comparisons rather than controlled tests of the contract variable itself. We release a reproducible testbed: 298 completed trajectories with condition tags, frozen memory/skill snapshots, prompt records, and analysis scripts -- an agent design and a validated, reusable methodology for studying how explicit memory layers shape long-horizon LLM-agent decisions.
