Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces AgenticDataBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based data agents across diverse domains and tasks in data science. By collecting real datasets from 15 vertical domains and employing a systematic LLM-based task generation approach, the benchmark captures the complexity of data workflows while providing fine-grained ground-truth labels. The evaluation of state-of-the-art data agents against this benchmark reveals detailed insights into their performance and skill-level capabilities, addressing a critical gap in the field of automated data science.
AgenticDataBench reveals that LLM-based data agents can be rigorously evaluated across diverse real-world scenarios, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in handling complex data tasks.
Data science aims to derive actionable insights from heterogeneous raw data, unlocking the value of the massive amounts of data generated in modern society. Automating this process is essential to reducing labor-intensive efforts for data scientists and enabling scalable data-driven applications. Recently, large language model (LLM)-based data agents have emerged as a promising solution to automate data science workflows. However, the field lacks comprehensive benchmarks to rigorously evaluate these agents across diverse scenarios with fine-grained granularity. To address this gap, we propose AgenticDataBench, a comprehensive benchmark featuring realistic tasks spanning diverse domains with fine-grained ground-truth labels. This enables evaluations to capture the diversity and complexity of data science workflows and the detailed performance of agents. First, to cover diverse domains, we collect real datasets and tasks from 15 vertical domains, including 5 real-world B2B use cases from a leading fintech company. Second, to remove redundancy in real-world tasks and generate high-quality tasks for domains lacking real data, we introduce data science skills, recurring data-centric operational patterns, and quantify benchmark coverage by the number of skills included. Representative skills are extracted from large-scale task solutions on Stack Overflow using skill-aligned hierarchical clustering. Third, for real-world business tasks, we select task-solution pairs that maximize diversity in skill composition, ensuring broad coverage of practical scenarios. Fourth, to generate realistic tasks for devise domains without real tasks, we propose a systematic LLM-based task generation approach to create workflows and tasks based on these skills. Finally, we evaluate state-of-the-art data agents using our annotated benchmark and open-sourced testbed, providing detailed skill-level insights.
Tsinghua AI