Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study conducts a longitudinal analysis of the adoption of second-generation anonymization protocols in the Bitcoin network, revealing that protocols like CoinJoin and CoinSwap account for less than 1% of transactions despite identifying millions of instances. The findings indicate a significant decline in detectable usage following regulatory events and highlight the absence of standardized Stealth Address adoption. The research underscores a troubling trend of privacy-seeking users migrating to less transparent methods, raising concerns about the future of anonymity in cryptocurrency.
Despite millions of transactions, second-generation Bitcoin anonymization protocols are barely used, with privacy-seeking users shifting to less detectable methods.
We present a longitudinal measurement study on the adoption of detectable, second-generation anonymisation protocols in the Bitcoin network, including CoinJoin, CoinSwap, CoinShuffle and Stealth Addresses. By implementing and refining a suite of heuristic filters, we identify over 5.94 million CoinJoin and 23.3 million CoinSwap transactions. Besides, the use of CoinShuffle was unexpectedly found to be closely aligned with the Wasabi wallet operation period. Our analysis reveals consistently low adoption rates, with these protocols constituting less than 1% of network transactions, and a sharp decline in detectable usage following key regulatory events. Furthermore, we find no evidence of standardised Stealth Address adoption, indicating a failure to converge on a common privacy standard. This study provides a comprehensive picture of a niche ecosystem whose on-chain visibility has been largely suppressed, strongly suggesting the migration of privacy-seeking users to less transparent and less detectable methods.
