Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces an explication interface for event-based emotion analysis that ensures the explanations provided by emotion classifiers are both causal and definitional. By utilizing a parser that maps input text to a structured Natural Semantic Metalanguage format, the authors achieve a transparent decision-making process that allows for auditability against the input data. The fine-tuned parser demonstrates competitive accuracy metrics, suggesting that this method offers a reliable alternative to traditional black-box models while maintaining a verifiable basis for emotion classification.
Emotion classifiers can now provide explanations that are not just post hoc but are grounded in definitional semantics, ensuring transparency and auditability.
Explanations for emotion classifiers are usually produced post hoc, with no guarantee that they reflect the computation behind the label. We present an explication interface for event-based emotion analysis. A parser maps the input text to an explication, a short script in the closed vocabulary of Natural Semantic Metalanguage organized into twelve typed slots, and a fixed decision list of rules transcribed from published semantic definitions computes the label from the explication alone. The faithfulness guarantee is therefore causal and definitional, while all empirical risk lives in the learned parser, which the per-line entailment interface makes auditable against the input. On crowd-sourced event descriptions, our fine-tuned parser reaches 0.33 accuracy and 0.48 selective accuracy on a small held-out set, suggesting that the interface trades insignificant accuracy difference to a black-box model for a verifiable, inspectable decision basis for first-person event-based emotion analysis. We also release EmoExpl-1200 with per-line verification metadata and the full rule set.
