Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Agri-SAGE addresses the limitations of traditional agricultural advisory systems by integrating retrieval-grounded multi-agent LLM reasoning with biophysical simulations from APSIM, allowing for context-aware recommendations that adapt to in-season variability. The framework was evaluated using three distinct reasoning approaches鈥擯lan-and-Solve, Tree of Thoughts, and Reflexion鈥攐ver a decade-long retrospective analysis, demonstrating significant improvements over static guidelines. Notably, the Tree of Thoughts approach achieved peak yields, while Reflexion provided similar agronomic outcomes at a reduced computational cost through cross-seasonal episodic memory utilization.
Agri-SAGE's integration of multi-agent LLMs with biophysical simulations reveals that adaptive reasoning can dramatically enhance agricultural advisory accuracy and efficiency.
Agricultural advisory systems face a fundamental tension: static agronomic guidelines offer consistent, evidence-based recommendations, yet remain blind to in-season variability and dynamic uncertainties. Recent advisory systems powered by LLMs are liable for a different risk of generating recommendations that are agronomically credible but physiologically unconvincing. Agri-SAGE is a closed-loop framework designed to resolve the above two limitations by integrating retrieval-grounded multi-agent LLM reasoning with APSIM-based biophysical simulation, to generate and validate agronomic advisories. To assess this framework, we evaluate three reasoning approaches, namely Plan-and-Solve, Tree of Thoughts, and Reflexion, over a 10-year retrospective analysis. All three significantly outperform static PoP (Package-of-Practice) baselines, with Tree of Thoughts achieving impressive peak yields. At the same time, Reflexion achieves comparable agronomic outcomes at substantially lower computational cost by leveraging cross-seasonal episodic memory.
