Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a comparative epistemic logic of understanding that incorporates level-indexed understanding modalities and a comparative connective to evaluate the degree of understanding between agents. By enriching multi-agent epistemic models with agent-indexed graded explanation structures, the authors create a framework that can represent varying levels of understanding and facilitate comparisons between agents. The results include soundness, strong completeness, and decidability for fixed finite-level fragments, providing a robust foundation for further exploration of understanding in epistemic contexts.
Understanding is not binary; this framework reveals how agents can possess varying degrees of comprehension about the same proposition, reshaping our approach to epistemic logic.
"Any fool can know; the point is to understand." A well-known remark often attributed to Einstein captures a widely shared intuition: understanding is more than merely knowing. Yet epistemic logic has paid relatively little attention to understanding, despite its central role in contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, and recent debates about AI. A recurring theme in the philosophical literature is that, unlike knowledge, understanding comes in degrees: one may understand something more or less well, and one's understanding may be better than another's. We introduce a comparative epistemic logic of understanding with level-indexed understanding modalities and a comparative connective for saying that one agent understands why a proposition better than another agent does. Semantically, we enrich multi-agent epistemic models with agent-indexed graded explanation structures and a justification-style term algebra. This yields a unified framework for representing minimal, ordinary, more demanding, and ideal understanding, together with comparisons between agents with respect to the same formula at issue. We distinguish a finitary bounded-level calculus from an infinitary full-language companion system. We establish soundness and strong completeness, and show that each fixed finite-level fragment is decidable.
