Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores a novel approach to rapid visual-analytics prototyping using the Artifact--Transform Workflow Language (ATWL) and an AI assistant, which together reduced the prototyping timeline from months to just one afternoon. The authors found that while ATWL provided a necessary scaffold for generating workflows, expert knowledge was crucial for enhancing the quality of the prototypes beyond initial average implementations. Their experiments revealed that the timing and method of scaffold introduction significantly impact the creative process, suggesting a need for a typology of human knowledge injection in AI-assisted design.
Rapid prototyping of visual analytics can be achieved in just hours by combining AI assistance with a structured workflow language, but expert input is essential for quality.
Testing a new visual-analytics idea usually takes months: one needs to find a realistic data set, clean it, and implement an interactive prototype. We describe a case where a workflow language and an AI assistant reduced this effort to one afternoon. The idea under test: relax the Pareto frontier with a tolerance and group the surviving options into recurring types -- ``constellations'' on a ``soft sky''. Using the Artifact--Transform Workflow Language (ATWL) as a scaffold, we obtained a consistent workflow in minutes and a running prototype in a few hours. We derive three lessons. The scaffold matters: without ATWL the assistant produced a naive workflow. The scaffold alone is not enough: the first implementation was only average, and expert knowledge injection was needed to reach state-of-the-art quality. Finally, the way the scaffold is used matters: controlled experiments show that a language definition and a library of examples support different aspects of the task, that providing both at once reduces quality because template following displaces creative content, and that scaffolds work best when introduced after an initial unconstrained design pass. We argue that the field needs a typology of human knowledge injection, in a form that is both human-editable and machine-accessible.
