Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces SWE-Interact, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate coding agents through multi-turn, interactive software engineering tasks that mimic real developer workflows. Unlike traditional benchmarks that provide complete requirements upfront, SWE-Interact employs a user simulator that gradually reveals task requirements and offers feedback, testing agents on their ability to adapt to evolving instructions and integrate prior work. Results show that top-performing models excel in vague initial conditions but still struggle with maintaining requirement fidelity and avoiding technical errors, highlighting a significant gap between single-turn and interactive coding capabilities.
Strong performance on single-turn coding tasks fails to predict success in interactive, user-driven environments, revealing critical gaps in agent adaptability.
We introduce SWE-Interact, a new testbed for evaluating coding agents on multi-turn, interactive, user-driven software engineering tasks. Existing frontier SWE benchmarks typically provide complete requirements upfront and evaluate agents on autonomous implementation. In contrast, SWE-Interact places agents in a realistic developer workflow: a carefully designed user simulator starts with vague or incomplete instructions, progressively reveals requirements, inspects the agent's workspace, and provides targeted feedback, revisions, and new constraints until the full task goal has been handed off. Grounded in large-scale studies of real coding-agent interactions, this setup tests whether agents can discover user intent, adapt to evolving requirements, and build on their own prior work. Across a suite of frontier and open-weight models, we find that strong performance on single-turn SWE tasks does not reliably transfer to multi-turn, user-driven workflows: the best-performing models solve roughly 50% of single-turn baseline tasks but only 25% of the corresponding SWE-Interact tasks. The strongest models in our evaluation, including Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5, start strong even in the face of vague initial instructions, persevere until all the requirements are surfaced by the user, integrate them better and write clean code. However, they still suffer from over-agentic coding, forgetting requirements and technical mistakes. Weaker models start poorly under ambiguity, give up early, forget or ignore instructions and rework their code more. Overall, SWE-Interact measures an orthogonal, real-world capability axis for frontier model development: interactive goal discovery and iterative refinement with a user in the loop.
