Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This position paper posits that humans possess an evolved instruction-following bias, which enables rapid instructed task learning (RITL) by allowing individuals to quickly generalize behavior from linguistic instructions. The authors draw parallels between this human cognitive trait and the instruction tuning mechanisms employed by large language models (LLMs) to achieve zero-shot performance on tasks. By synthesizing insights from cognitive science, neuroscience, and machine learning, the paper advocates for interdisciplinary research to explore this inductive bias as a foundational element in both human and artificial intelligence systems.
Humans' innate ability to follow instructions may mirror the mechanisms that allow LLMs to excel at zero-shot learning, revealing a shared cognitive architecture.
Human adults can often perform a novel task correctly on the first attempt after only receiving verbal or written instructions. This rapid instructed task learning (RITL) is a hallmark of human cognitive flexibility, yet its mechanisms and parallels in artificial systems remain under-explored across disciplines. In this position paper, we argue that humans possess an evolved instruction-following bias -- an inductive bias shaped by evolution to interpret and execute linguistic instructions which critically enables fast generalization of behavior from language. This bias functions analogously to the way large language models (LLMs) leverage instruction tuning to achieve zero-shot task performance. We synthesize evidence from cognitive science, neuroscience, and machine learning research to support this hypothesis. While instruction-following in AI is currently achieved via specialized training protocols, we posit that in humans it arises as an innate cognitive architecture feature. We outline testable predictions and call for more interdisciplinary research to investigate Instruction-Following as a unifying mechanism enabling rapid task learning in both natural and artificial neural networks.
Amazon Science