Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a Judge-Aware Gated Multi-Task Learning architecture that effectively distinguishes between objective case facts and judicial discretion in legal outcome prediction. By employing a fine-grained outcome taxonomy and a Gated Fusion mechanism, the model achieves state-of-the-art performance on 13,937 UK Employment Tribunal decisions while using significantly fewer parameters than traditional supervised fine-tuning methods. The architecture not only improves accuracy, particularly for ambiguous cases, but also enhances interpretability by providing insights into how adjudicative context influences predictions.
Gated Multi-Task Learning reveals that a structured approach to modeling judicial discretion can outperform larger models in legal outcome prediction with far fewer parameters.
Legal outcome prediction must disentangle objective case facts from adjudicative context. Merit-based rulings rely on factual evidence while technical disposals may hinge on judicial discretion. We propose a Judge-Aware Gated Multi-Task Learning architecture that explicitly models this distinction. We introduce a fine-grained outcome taxonomy to supervise the encoder, enforcing a structural regularization that disentangles distinct semantic pathways. This granular legal curriculum enables our Gated Fusion mechanism to dynamically modulate reliance on judge identity. We evaluate our approach on 13,937 UK Employment Tribunal decisions. We benchmark our design against supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of a Gemma-4 26B-A4B backbone, in which judge identity and the taxonomy are injected as prompt tokens or autoregressive output targets. The two contextual signals compose only weakly when forced through a single autoregressive channel. In contrast, coupling a LoRA-adapted Gemma-4 encoder with our gated architecture defines a new state of the art on this benchmark while requiring an order of magnitude fewer trainable parameters than the generative SFT baselines, with gains concentrated on the most ambiguous and rarest outcome classes. Beyond accuracy, the architecture is interpretable; learned judge embeddings and calibration profiles localize the cases where adjudicative context drives the prediction. These results indicate that, for identity-conditioned classification of legal outcomes, the choice of conditioning interface dominates scale: differentiable structured composition yields more accurate, more parameter-efficient models than prompt-based composition over a substantially larger backbone.
