Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces RedVox, a multilingual benchmark designed to evaluate safety and fairness in speech models across five languages. The study reveals that only 8% of existing speech model releases include multilingual safety analyses, highlighting a significant oversight in the field. Evaluations of eight state-of-the-art models demonstrate that vulnerabilities not only persist but are exacerbated in non-English languages and when inputs are spoken, underscoring the urgent need for improved safety measures in diverse linguistic contexts.
Vulnerabilities in speech models are not just a problem for English; they worsen in other languages and with spoken inputs, revealing a critical oversight in AI safety.
Speech-capable models are increasingly deployed in real-world applications across languages. Yet their safety and fairness beyond English settings and under naturalistic conditions remain understudied. We survey safety reporting practices across state-of-the-art speech model releases, finding that only 8% document any multilingual analysis. To address this gap, we introduce RedVox, a multilingual safety and fairness benchmark for audio and speech built on real voices, covering unsafe and unfair stereotypical requests across five languages (English, French, Italian, Spanish, and German). Evaluating eight state-of-the-art models, we find that vulnerabilities persist even under non-adversarial conditions, worsen in non-English languages, and are amplified when the request comes from a spoken input. Finally, by surveying the participants who contributed to RedVox, we document the unique personal and privacy challenges of collecting speech data with human participants, pointing to broader sociotechnical challenges in naturalistic speech safety research.
