Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study merges abstract logical structures with context-level linguistic cues to enhance the classification of logical fallacies, which are often nuanced and complex. By leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to inductively extract patterns from fallacious examples and their explanations, the authors demonstrate significant improvements in classification accuracy across various LLMs and experimental setups. The findings reveal that this data-driven pattern extraction method not only surpasses zero-shot baselines but also generalizes effectively across different datasets, marking a substantial advancement in fallacy detection techniques.
Merging logical structures with linguistic context allows for a dramatic leap in fallacy classification accuracy, outperforming traditional methods.
In today's fast-paced information era, logical fallacies, defined as defective patterns of reasoning, inevitably contribute to the growth of information disorder. However, often fallacies appear in nuanced forms that complicate automated classification. In this study, we investigate whether merging abstract logical structures with context-level linguistic cues proves beneficial for fallacy classification, developing a framework that inductively extracts such patterns from fallacious examples and their explanations using Large Language Models (LLMs). We evaluate the impact of these patterns across different LLMs and experimental zero- and one-shot configurations, showing statistically significant improvements over zero-shot baselines and outperforming competing approaches. Cross-dataset experiments validate generalization, establishing data-driven pattern extraction as an effective method for generating logical representations.
