Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the relationship between predictive loss and computational effort in limit order book (LOB) prediction, revealing a power-law relationship that characterizes the empirical inference-compute frontier. By analyzing various models, including small decision trees and neural architectures, the authors find that their proposed FastBiNLOB architecture significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art models in macro-F1 scores while maintaining lower latency. The results highlight the importance of optimizing for both predictive accuracy and computational efficiency in financial forecasting applications.
FastBiNLOB achieves superior predictive performance with lower latency, challenging the conventional trade-off between accuracy and speed in limit order book prediction.
We study whether a scaling-law-style inference-compute frontier appears in limit order book prediction. Using FI-2010 and a suite of models ranging from small decision trees to neural LOB architectures, we find that the realized empirical frontier of predictive loss versus structural forward work is well summarized by a power law. In particular, with MLPLOB held out as an architecture family, a power-law fit to the low- and mid-compute non-MLPLOB frontier extrapolates across multiple orders of magnitude and attains $R^2=0.941$ on the excluded high-compute MLPLOB target frontier. A similar exercise in latency space gives substantially weaker results, showing that latency is not merely noisy compute. We use this gap to motivate FastBiNLOB, a dense axis-separable LOB mixer built from hardware-friendly temporal and feature mixing operations. In a five-seed experiment, FastBiNLOB exceeds the published $y_{10}$ and $y_{100}$ macro-F1 targets at notably lower latency than existing published SOTA architectures.
