Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a predict-optimize-explain framework that utilizes gradient-based sample generation to interpret portfolio models by identifying macroeconomic conditions that yield specific portfolio outcomes. By constructing economically meaningful what-if scenarios, the framework probes decision pipelines to reveal behavioral differences between predict-then-optimize and predict-and-optimize strategies. The findings underscore the importance of integrating prediction, optimization, and explanation to enhance the robustness and transparency of portfolio management strategies.
Uncovering how macroeconomic conditions can shift portfolio strategies reveals critical insights that challenge traditional optimization approaches.
We propose a predict-optimize-explain framework that uses gradient-based sample generation to interpret various portfolio models by identifying macroeconomic conditions that induce specified portfolio outcomes. Unlike traditional feature-importance methods, this approach directly probes decision pipelines (predictive models coupled with portfolio optimization) by constructing economically meaningful what-if questions. We focus on four such questions: under what macroeconomic conditions a predict-then-optimize pipeline closes or reverses its return gap with a predict-and-optimize pipeline; what conditions lead a pipeline to diversify rather than concentrate its allocation; when a pipeline trained on calm markets overtakes one trained through crises; and what conditions would let a pipeline match a benchmark return. These examples illustrate how our framework uncovers key behavioral differences between various decision pipelines. Beyond these cases, the proposed framework is flexible and can support a wide range of probing questions tailored to specific portfolio objectives. Our findings highlight the value of integrating prediction, optimization, and explanation to produce more robust and transparent portfolio strategies.
