Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study advances the understanding of joint durability in the Jansen walking linkage by incorporating a realistic clearance model that reveals significant discrepancies in joint load and wear predictions compared to idealized models. By employing a forward-dynamic model that integrates a clearance joint with a continuous contact law and feedback mechanisms, the authors demonstrate that neglecting clearance can lead to underestimations of peak joint loads and overestimations of durability. Key findings indicate that optimized designs exhibit up to 9-7x lower wear rates, highlighting the critical impact of clearance on joint performance and durability in practical applications.
Neglecting joint clearance can double peak loads and dramatically skew durability rankings, revealing hidden vulnerabilities in design assessments.
A companion study introduced joint durability into the dimensional design of the Theo Jansen walking linkage and found its classical "holy numbers" Pareto-dominated, but it modelled the revolute joints as ideal, clearance-free pins, so its wear figures were relative rankings, not a prediction of in-service degradation. Here we relax that idealization. We build a forward-dynamic model of the Jansen leg in which a revolute joint becomes a clearance joint with a continuous normal contact law (Lankarani-Flores, hysteresis-damped) and Ambrosio friction, integrated as a constraint-stabilized differential-algebraic system, and couple it to the Archard law in a wear->clearance->impact feedback loop. Three findings emerge. First, neglecting clearance underestimates the peak joint load: the clearance model gives a peak contact force of ~104 N at the load-bearing pin against ~48 N for the ideal joint (~2x amplification), rising to ~426 N when two joints carry clearance at once. Second, the coupling is strongly impact-sensitive--single trajectories are non-monotonic and can reverse the design ranking, a chaos consistent with the literature--so designs must be compared statistically; over an ensemble of 16 randomized phases the optimized joint is robustly more durable, with per-cycle wear ~9-7x lower (peak force ~4x lower) at one clearance joint and still ~1.7x lower on both with two (p<0.01 throughout). Third, the wear is strongly non-uniform--it concentrates on a ~10 deg load arc--so assuming uniform clearance growth underestimates local clearance growth by ~36x. The clearance-free durability advantage thus survives the chaotic, multi-joint, non-uniformly-worn coupling in the ensemble mean. We deliver the first clearance-coupled forward-dynamic model of the Jansen leg and specify a falsifiable protocol to test each prediction.
