Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This research investigates the effectiveness of Benjamin Graham's classic value investing principles as a stabilizing influence on modern machine learning models used for equity selection. By comparing pure Graham rules, contemporary market factors, and a hybrid approach against advanced algorithms like XGBoost and AutoGluon over 20 years of S&P 500 data, the study reveals that simpler, value-driven strategies can outperform more complex models in terms of risk-adjusted returns. The findings highlight that while advanced models can yield high returns, they also expose investors to significant risks, reinforcing the relevance of Graham's "margin of safety" in today's market.
Classic value investing principles can outperform complex AI models by providing a crucial risk management framework in volatile markets.
Modern finance relies heavily on complex machine learning models to find patterns in the stock market. However, as these AI models get more complicated, they often memorize short-term market noise instead of finding companies with real, lasting value. We designed this research to test if Benjamin Graham's classic value investing rules could act as a mathematical "low-pass filter" to keep these modern models in check. We built three different sets of features - pure Graham rules, modern market factors, and a mix of both - and tested them against highly complex models (XGBoost and AutoGluon) using 20 years of S&P 500 data. By applying a strict buy-and-hold strategy over a four-year test period (March 2022 to March 2026), the results showed that more complex algorithms do not always win. While the AutoGluon model captured high returns (222.68%), it suffered a substantial 39.78% drop because it bought volatile tech stocks right before the market crashed. On the other hand, the pure Graham Random Forest achieved the highest overall return (232.13%) with much less risk (1.38 Calmar Ratio). Furthermore, the Combined Random Forest successfully mixed momentum with Graham's rules, making a 202.91% return while keeping the lowest maximum drop (34.53%) of any model tested. Ultimately, this research proves that Graham's "margin of safety" isn't outdated; it is actually a highly effective way to prevent modern AI from taking on too much risk.
