Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Counterfactual-World (CF-World) benchmark to evaluate the causal reasoning capabilities of text-to-image (T2I) models by testing their performance in generating images under counterfactual scenarios that contradict real-world priors. The study reveals that T2I models, regardless of their architecture, struggle significantly when transitioning from factual to counterfactual generation, indicating a reliance on entrenched visual-textual correlations rather than genuine causal understanding. Key metrics, Prior Resistance Rate (PRR) and Reasoning Retention Rate (RRR), highlight the models' failure to maintain reasoning in the absence of explicit visual cues, underscoring the limitations of current T2I systems in handling complex causal reasoning tasks.
T2I models falter dramatically in counterfactual scenarios, revealing their dependence on familiar visual patterns rather than true causal reasoning.
Text-to-image (T2I) generation models have achieved remarkable progress in producing visually realistic images from natural language prompts. Yet it remains unclear whether their success reflects genuine causal understanding or sophisticated pattern matching over visual-textual correlations. Inspired by Russell's inductivist turkey, we introduce Counterfactual-World (CF-World), a counterfactual benchmark designed to investigate whether text-to-image models can generate images under rules that systematically contradict real-world priors. CF-World organizes each scenario into three progressive levels: factual generation under ordinary world knowledge, explicit counterfactual generation with direct visual instructions, and implicit counterfactual generation requiring causal deduction from altered rules. We evaluate both open-source and closed-source T2I models using a Vision Language Model (VLM)-based evaluator (CF-Eval). Furthermore, we introduce two metrics: Prior Resistance Rate (PRR), which measures a model's ability to overcome entrenched real-world priors, and Reasoning Retention Rate (RRR), which assesses whether models can maintain reasoning-dependent counterfactual generation without explicit visual cues. Experiments show that all models exhibit sharp degradation from factual to counterfactual settings. Further analyses suggest that these failures arise because current T2I models encode world knowledge and visual appearances as tightly coupled patterns. Consequently, their heavy reliance on frequent visual co-occurrences within the training data forces them to default to familiar commonsense priors when tasked with rendering counterfactual worlds.
