Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study reinterprets Large Language Models (LLMs) as high-dimensional Dense Associative Memories that utilize latent attractors for reasoning. By analyzing the energy landscape of mathematical reasoning, the authors propose a Gibbs-weighted retrieval mechanism that samples reasoning paths based on their spectral entropy, effectively identifying stable reasoning chains. The method significantly enhances the performance of Microsoft Phi-3.5 on the GSM8K benchmark, illustrating that reasoning can be viewed as a dynamic process of settling into attractor basins rather than a straightforward next-token prediction task.
Correct reasoning in LLMs can be viewed as navigating deep attractor basins, leading to a 5.38% performance boost on GSM8K when leveraging Gibbs-weighted retrieval.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are traditionally viewed as autoregressive generators. However, from the perspective of collective computation, they function as high-dimensional Dense Associative Memories that store complex reasoning patterns as latent attractors. In this work, we investigate the energy landscape of mathematical reasoning. We posit that correct reasoning chains correspond to deep, wide attractor basins ("flat minima") in the model's output distribution, whereas hallucinations manifest as sharp, unstable local minima. To exploit this geometry, we introduce a retrieval mechanism based on a Gibbs measure of the trajectory's spectral entropy. By sampling multiple reasoning paths and weighting them by their inverse energy ($P \propto e^{-尾E}$), we approximate the equilibrium distribution of the associative memory, effectively ``relaxing'' the system into a robust solution. Empirically, this physics-inspired mechanism improves Microsoft Phi-3.5 performance on GSM8K by 5.38\% (84.7\% $\to$ 90.1\%), demonstrating that inference is better modeled as a dynamic settling process into an attractor basin rather than greedy next-token prediction.
