Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
EgoSAT is introduced as the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating egocentric video reasoning in streaming contexts, targeting the continuous interpretation of evolving visual information by vision-language models (VLMs). The benchmark encompasses 1,997 unique videos and approximately 4,800 question-answer pairs, designed to assess models' abilities in retrospective, online, and prospective reasoning. Evaluation results reveal that current VLMs struggle significantly with both prospective and retrospective tasks and exhibit severe mis-calibration, leading to instances of "confidently wrong" predictions.
Current vision-language models falter in streaming interaction understanding, with alarming mis-calibration leading to confidently incorrect predictions.
We introduce EgoSAT, the first comprehensive benchmark for egocentric video reasoning in streaming settings, designed to evaluate the capabilities of modern vision-language models (VLMs). The benchmark targets streaming interaction understanding, where video frames arrive sequentially and models must continuously interpret evolving visual context. EgoSAT unifies several previously distinct tasks within a single streaming framework. In this formulation, queries about completed events correspond to retrospective reasoning, queries about ongoing activities require online understanding, and queries about future actions involve prospective anticipation. This unified setting requires models to reason about the past, present, and future while operating under the constraint that only previously observed frames are available. EgoSAT contains 1,997 unique videos spanning 165 hours of egocentric footage and around 4,800 high-quality question-answer pairs, carefully designed to probe reasoning across varying temporal contexts. Using this benchmark, we evaluate a diverse set of both open-weight and closed-weight VLMs, providing a systematic assessment of their ability for streaming interaction understanding. By distinguishing answerability and conducting diagnostics on confidence of models, we find existing models not only struggle with prospective and retrospective modeling, but also exhibit severe mis-calibration: confidence often fails to track inherent answerability, leading to dangerous "confidently wrong" behaviors. Project page: https://leiyj23.github.io/EgoSAT/