Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Tailor-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate visual world models on their ability to simulate irregular physical interactions, which are often underrepresented in existing datasets. By structuring the evaluation into Regular, Unconventional, and Impossible scenarios, the authors systematically assess models' reasoning capabilities and generalization of physical principles. Experimental results demonstrate a significant performance drop as the scenarios become more challenging, revealing that current models struggle with generalization and often rely on superficial visual cues rather than understanding underlying physical constraints.
Current visual world models show a dramatic decline in performance when faced with unconventional and impossible physical interactions, highlighting a critical gap in their generalization capabilities.
Physical interactions follow a long-tailed distribution: a set of common and regular interactions dominates human experience and visual data, while a broad spectrum of rare and irregular interactions remains underrepresented. Although recent visual world models, including image and video generation models, achieve impressive realism on existing benchmarks, they primarily focus on simulating common physical interactions. This raises a central question: Do current visual world models internalize and generalize physical principles? In this work, we introduce Tailor-Bench, a benchmark that challenges world models to simulate irregular physical interactions. To enable systematic evaluation, we design three scenario modes that progressively challenge model reasoning: Regular scenarios reflect common tool-task pairs, Unconventional scenarios replace conventional tools with attribute-compatible substitutes to test affordance generalization, and Impossible scenarios introduce attribute-violating tools to probe constraint awareness. Additionally, we design two complementary settings under a unified evaluation protocol: predictive generation requires inferring outcomes without guidance, while descriptive generation specifies the target outcome for faithful realization. Our experimental results reveal a clear long-tail gap in physical world modeling: performance degrades from Regular to Unconventional and Impossible scenarios, indicating limited generalization beyond common interactions. Failure analysis further shows that models rely on superficial visual patterns: image models fail to realize correct state changes, while video models further suffer from temporal inconsistencies.
CMU ML