Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates whether the geographic origins of Tang-dynasty poets can be detected through linguistic features in their poetry, utilizing a dataset of 357 poets linked to their administrative circuits. By applying multi-class classification with character $n$-gram TF-IDF and domain features, the authors achieve a prediction accuracy of 0.69, significantly surpassing the majority baseline of 0.53. Key findings reveal a distance-decay effect in poetic language, temporal variations in regional separability, and historically meaningful misclassifications, suggesting that interpretable machine learning can serve as a valuable tool for literary historical analysis.
Linguistic analysis reveals that geographic distance between Tang poets correlates with distinct poetic styles, challenging assumptions about uniformity in literary expression. WHY_IT MATTERS: This research could transform our understanding of regional influences in historical literature and enhance the application of machine learning in humanities scholarship.
We ask whether the geographic origin of Tang-dynasty poets leaves a detectable linguistic trace in their work. Aggregating every poem attributed to each author in the Complete Tang Poems (Quan Tang Shi) and linking poets to their administrative circuit of origin via the China Biographical Database (CBDB), we build a poet-level corpus of 357 poets across the ten Tang circuits and frame origin prediction as multi-class classification. Using character $n$-gram TF-IDF together with interpretable domain features (imagery, season, and allusion), classical and neural models predict a poet's broad region (South vs.\ North) at $0.69$ accuracy, well above the $0.53$ majority baseline, and finer circuit-level origin above chance. Beyond classification, three findings emerge. (i) Linguistic distance between circuits grows with geographic distance (Mantel $r=0.40$, $p\approx0.09$ over nine circuits), evidence of a distance-decay effect in poetic language. (ii) The signal interacts with time: South/North separability is at chance in the High Tang and strongest in the Late Tang, consistent with court-driven homogenization at the empire's height followed by regional divergence. (iii) The model's confident errors are historically meaningful -- in the Early Tang, every misclassification is a southern poet read as northern, reflecting the prestige of the northern court idiom. We further show that, when given the whole corpus through a hierarchical frozen-encoder representation, a classical-Chinese transformer (GuwenBERT) only matches -- not beats -- simple TF-IDF, and that combining them adds nothing, indicating that character $n$-grams already capture the regional signal. Our results position interpretable machine learning as a hypothesis generator for literary history.
UW