Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the concept of agency in AI, particularly in the context of Large Language Models (LLMs) marketed as autonomous agents. It distinguishes between agentic systems, which rely on external structures for functionality, and agentive systems, which exhibit true autonomy through internalized mechanisms of goal-setting, identity, decision-making, self-regulation, and learning. The authors introduce the Goal-Identity-Configurator (GIC) architecture as a framework for developing general-purpose agents that balance autonomy with human oversight, emphasizing the importance of internalized agency for safe and effective AI systems.
Genuine agency in AI requires internalized structures, not just engineered workflows, to ensure true autonomy and safety.
What is an agent? What constitutes agency? With the rise of Large Language Model (LLM) systems marketed as ``coding agents'', ``AI co-scientists'', and other ``agentic" tools that promise to drive up productivity, and at the same time, ``existential" concerns such as AI escaping human control with destructive power under a speculative ``machine agency" against humans, it has become essential to clarify where automation ends and agency begins, both for building capable systems and for understanding whether and what to fear. Drawing on Descartes' grounding of agency in independent thought, and on portrayals of autonomous beings in science fiction, we survey the current landscape of AI agents, and analyze agent architectures along five dimensions: goal, identity, decision-making, self-regulation, and learning. Specifically, we argue that genuine agency requires these structures to be internalized within the system itself rather than assembled through external scaffolding. This distinction between agentic systems, whose competence resides in engineered workflows, and agentive systems, whose capabilities (including social interaction) arise endogenously, defines the boundary between systems designed for prescribed tasks, and those capable of operating in the open world with true autonomy. Building on this analysis, we propose the Goal-Identity-Configurator (GIC) architecture for a general-purpose agent model, combining hierarchical goal decomposition, identity evolution, simulative reasoning grounded in a separately trained world model, learned self-regulation, and self-directed learning from both real and simulated experience. Furthermore, we share insight on the auditability, controllability, and safety of agentive systems that possess greater autonomy and ``agency", but remain under human oversight.
