Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces VeriEvol, a novel framework that enhances reinforcement learning for visual mathematical reasoning by addressing the challenges of data reliability and prompt difficulty scaling. By decoupling the evolution of prompt difficulty from answer verification through an iterative process, the authors significantly improve the accuracy of models trained on a large-scale dataset. The results show a substantial increase in mean accuracy from 35.42 to 54.73 on a five-benchmark visual-math suite, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed methods in scaling reliable data for reinforcement learning.
Evolving prompts and verifying answers can boost visual reasoning model accuracy by over 19%鈥攁 game changer for scaling reliable data in AI.
Scaling reinforcement learning for visual mathematical reasoning requires more than generating harder questions: as data volume grows, the reward labels themselves must remain reliable. Yet existing data pipelines scale supervision while trusting the labeller, and policy-side methods assume the underlying answers are already correct. We instead treat scaling as a verifiable data-construction problem and decouple two axes before any policy update: prompt difficulty, expanded by route-specific evolution operators, and answer reliability, enforced by offline hypothesis-test falsification. We instantiate this as VeriEvol, an iterative framework with two extensible components: a type-aware evolution module that rewrites low-difficulty image-question seeds into harder, image-grounded prompts; and HTV-Agent, a verifier that accepts an answer only after multi-source counter-evidence has failed to refute it. The resulting verified data scales in volume, extends by adding evolution routes or verifier channels, and plugs directly into existing GRPO-style RL recipes. On a five-benchmark visual-math suite, scaling evolved SFT data from 10K to 250K samples raises the mean accuracy from 35.42 to 54.73; then, with backbone, SFT initialization, and GRPO recipe held fixed, VeriEvol adds a cumulative +3.88 over an un-evolved RL baseline, of which +1.82 comes from evolved prompts and +2.06 from the HTV-Agent verifier. We release the prompts, data, models, code, and the full verifier trace of every sample, so that downstream work can scale and audit the pipeline rather than only inspect its outputs.
Tsinghua AI