Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Arbor introduces a novel method for 3D asset generation that allows for explicit geometric control through the use of constraint meshes, enabling users to specify regions for object presence, avoidance, and contact. This approach addresses the limitations of traditional text and image prompts, which fail to convey spatial intent effectively. The evaluation shows that Arbor enhances constraint obedience while maintaining high object quality and variation, outperforming existing methods in both automatic metrics and user preference studies.
Constraint meshes in Arbor provide a powerful new way to dictate 3D object placement and interaction, significantly improving control over asset generation.
Text and image conditioned 3D models now generate convincing assets, but they still offer little direct control over the space an object should occupy or avoid. In authoring, this spatial intent is often known before generation starts. A chair should fit a seating envelope, a prop should leave clearance for motion, or a part should expose a contact surface. Prompts and image views are poor carriers for such constraints, requiring the need for an explicit control interface. We present Arbor, a trainable attachment for text conditioned latent 3D generation. Arbor introduces constraint meshes as a native 3D control interface. The interface uses hull regions where geometry should exist, avoidance regions that should remain empty, and touch regions the object should contact. Unlike completion or whole object scaffold control, these meshes are not target evidence. They are local typed requirements and can include regions where no surface should appear. Arbor keeps this signal as geometry by converting constraint meshes into tokens and learning a routed attachment inside a frozen denoiser. Each latent region can therefore receive the part of the constraint that matters for its spatial location. We evaluate Arbor on automatic and artist curated control benchmarks with hull, avoidance, and touch constraints, and compare the metric trends to a user preference study. Even without dedicated compliance losses, Arbor improves constraint obedience while preserving object quality and variation under fixed constraints.
