Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study systematically characterizes the performance and energy efficiency of five flagship scientific applications on the SuperMUC-NG phase 2 supercomputer, utilizing both CPU-only and CPU+GPU configurations. The findings reveal that GPU offloading can achieve 4-12 times higher throughput and up to 15 times better energy efficiency compared to CPU-only execution, particularly benefiting applications like lammps and AthenaK. However, the advantages are highly dependent on problem granularity, with smaller mesh-block sizes in AthenaK diminishing the expected performance gains from GPU acceleration.
GPU offloading can dramatically enhance throughput and energy efficiency for scientific applications, but the benefits hinge on problem size and granularity.
We present a systematic performance and energy-efficiency characterization of five flagship scientific workloads on SuperMUC-NG phase 2, the 28 PetaFLOPs system at the Leibniz Supercomputing Center (LRZ) equipped with Intel Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 (Ponte Vecchio, PVC) accelerators. The selected codes span molecular dynamics (gromacs, lammps), astrophysics and cosmology (OpenGadget3, AthenaK), and finite-element PDE solvers from the dealii-X Center of Excellence. For each code we measure throughput and energy efficiency expressed as compute-elements per wall-clock second (or per Joule of consumed energy) on a single compute node, comparing CPU-only (SPR) against combined CPU+GPU (SPR+PVC) configurations where available. Energy measurements rely on lightweight code instrumentation with p3em, or the Energy Aware Runtime (EAR) present on the system. Our results show that GPU offload yields $4-12\times$ higher throughput and up to $15\times$ better energy efficiency compared to CPU-only execution, with lammps and AthenaK benefiting most. However, both throughput and energy gains are sensitive to problem granularity: insufficient work per GPU tile erodes the accelerator advantage, as clearly observed in AthenaK at small mesh-block sizes. The power-budget utilization is systematically lower for CPUs than it is for GPUs, indicating that even at peak useful-work rate, most applications running on CPUs leave a significant fraction of the node's thermal envelope unused.
