Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates how language influences the attribution of credit for inventions across eleven large language models, analyzing responses to 21 disputed historical claims in 12 languages with a total of 75,896 responses. The findings reveal that query language significantly affects which historical figures are recognized, with lower-status claimants more likely to be acknowledged when questions are posed in their native languages, while dominant Anglophone figures consistently appear across all languages. This suggests that large language models serve as distributed systems of cultural memory, where language shapes the visibility of different national narratives and histories, highlighting the interplay between language and national identity in AI outputs.
Query language can dramatically shift historical credit in LLMs, revealing a hidden bias that favors dominant narratives over marginalized voices.
Who invented the radio, Russia's Alexander Popov or Italy's Guglielmo Marconi? Was the telephone the achievement of Bell in the United States or Meucci in Italy? Does printing belong to China's Bi Sheng or Germany's Gutenberg? The answer depends not only on historical record but also on language and perspective. We analyse eleven widely used large language models across 21 disputed inventions and discoveries, evaluated in twelve languages and 75,896 responses. While models generally acknowledge that credit is contested, query language systematically affects which claimant is surfaced. Lower-status claimants are more likely to appear when questions are asked in their associated language, whereas dominant Anglophone figures remain stable across languages. These patterns persist after controlling for response length, model differences, historical prominence, and levels of national commemoration. Language thus acts as a switch that activates different national versions of the same history, producing systematically different national memories from the same question. We interpret this as evidence that large language models function as distributed systems of cultural memory, where language conditions which histories become visible, contributing to a computational form of banal nationalism.
Tsinghua AI