Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the charge transfer state and local excited states in pentacene-buckminsterfullerene organic solar cell models using various computational methods, including CAM-B3LYP, B3LYP, and DFTB. The findings reveal that the charge transfer energy calculated with CAM-B3LYP closely matches that from an optimally tuned range-separated hybrid functional, while B3LYP and DFTB significantly underestimate this energy by approximately 1 eV across all models. These results highlight the importance of selecting appropriate computational methods for accurately modeling charge transfer processes in organic photovoltaics.
Charge transfer energy estimates can vary by nearly 1 eV depending on the computational method used, with standard approaches like B3LYP falling short.
The charge transfer state, the local excited state on pentacene, and the local excited state on buckminsterfullerene have been studied for four models of the pentacene-buckminsterfullerene organic solar cell. These models have different interface configurations between the donor and the acceptor. The study has been done by using different functionals and time-dependent density functional theory-namely, the long range-separated hybrid with coulomb-attenuating method approach (CAM-B3LYP functional), the popular B3LYP (Becke, three-parameter, Lee- Yang-Parr) exchange-correlation functional, and the density functional tight binding (DFTB) method. The charge transfer state energy obtained by using CAM-B3LYP without optimally tuned range-separated hybrid parameters are very close to those obtained by using a many-body dispersion-corrected, optimally tuned range-separated hybrid functional (OPT-wB97XD). Both the B3LYP functional and the DFTB method fail to describe correctly the charge transfer energy for all models. Each of them is underestimating around 1 eV compared with range-separated hybrid functional.
