Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the expressivity of ASPIC$^+$ argumentation frameworks when faced with uncertain preference profiles, contrasting them with various abstract formalisms that incorporate uncertain defeats. The findings reveal that many anticipated results are negative, challenging existing assumptions about the frameworks' capabilities. Additionally, the authors propose a conjecture regarding a non-trivial threshold for expressivity related to uncertain preferences and provide foundational proofs to support this conjecture.
The study uncovers unexpected limitations in the expressivity of argumentation frameworks, suggesting a critical threshold for uncertain preferences that could redefine our understanding of argumentation theory.
This paper studies the expressive power of ASPIC$^+$ argumentation frameworks with uncertain preference profiles by comparing them with several abstract formalisms with uncertain defeats. Most of our results are negative (and some of them are theoretically unexpected). We also conjecture a positive, non-trivial threshold for the expressivity of uncertain preferences, and prove some essential preliminary steps toward the confirmation of this conjecture.
