Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the energy consumption of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) in the context of 6G wireless networks, where frequent distribution shifts can impair model performance. By comparing UDA to traditional single-task training, the authors identify conditions under which UDA becomes more energy-efficient than retraining, factoring in labeling costs. The key finding is that UDA can be more advantageous when a minimum number of target domains is reached, providing a clearer framework for selecting adaptation strategies in energy-constrained environments.
UDA can outperform traditional retraining in energy efficiency, but only after a critical number of target domains is reached鈥攁re you adapting wisely?
The deployment of data-driven models in 6G wireless networks is increasingly challenged by frequent distribution shifts that degrade performance over time. Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) offers an alternative approach by adapting the trained model to a shifted domain without requiring labels. However, UDA pipelines are often more complex than single-task training due to additional modules and optimization procedures, raising a practical question: do the benefits of adaptation come at a higher energy cost, and how does this trade-off compare to retraining when labeling effort is also considered? In this work, we investigate the energy consumption of UDA and compare it to single task. We further propose a way to determine the minimum number of target domains for which UDA becomes more energy-efficient than retraining, taking into account the labeling cost. Our results aim to clarify when UDA should be preferred over classical train-from-scratch approaches from an energy and labeling-aware perspective.
