Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper establishes a comprehensive taxonomy for conceptual alignment in human-robot dialogue, emphasizing the bidirectional and co-constructive nature of this process. By identifying triggers for alignment initiation and levels of conceptual understanding, the authors provide a nuanced framework that enhances the design and analysis of human-robot interactions. The introduction of a dialogue act schema serves as a practical tool for capturing the interactional dynamics necessary for achieving effective alignment, paving the way for more sophisticated communication between humans and robots.
Conceptual alignment in human-robot dialogue is not just a one-way street; it鈥檚 a dynamic, co-constructive process that can redefine how robots understand human intent.
Successful conversations require speakers to align on the meaning of concepts, a challenging but crucial task for human-robot interaction. Understanding the process of establishing such alignment is hindered by competing interpretations of the term and isolated, unidirectional investigations of its design space. This paper argues for a design-centric understanding of conceptual alignment as a bidirectional and co-constructive process. We introduce a taxonomy that characterizes conceptual alignment dialogues along what triggers its initiation and what level(s) of conceptual understanding it concerns. We further present a dialogue act schema as an operational tool that captures the interactional moves through which alignment is achieved. Together, these contributions provide a structured foundation for analyzing, comparing, and designing conceptual alignment in human-robot interaction.
