Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the SciTraj corpus, a novel claim-grounded typed citation graph that captures the evolution of research across NLP, ML, and CV by linking citations to specific claim sentences. By employing natural language inference (NLI) to verify claim-driven relations and utilizing cosine similarity for others, the authors construct a comprehensive dataset of 32,559 papers and 573,126 directed edges across six relation types. The findings reveal significant disciplinary siloing and concentrated topic emergence, particularly in Vision and LLM-related research, while also providing a robust framework for future citation analysis and link prediction tasks.
Disciplinary siloing in research is starkly revealed through a novel citation graph that links claims to their sources, reshaping our understanding of knowledge evolution in AI fields.
How does research evolve, and what substrate would let us forecast where it goes next? Scientific progress is not simply a uniform accumulation of facts: ideas extend prior methods, address known limitations, realize proposed future directions, and sometimes dispute earlier claims. Existing citation graphs usually collapse these roles into a single homogeneous edge type, limiting how we can analyze scientific progress. We address this gap by proposing the SciTraj corpus, the first claim-grounded typed citation graph in which each edge is linked to the specific claim sentence that motivates it. Claim-bearing sentences are extracted from paper sections; four claim-driven relations are verified by NLI entailment against in-paper context, while two similarity-only relations are gated by abstract cosine and year-gap rules. SciTraj contains 32,559 papers from NLP, ML, and Vision (2015--2024), connected by 573,126 directed edges across six relation types, with NLI-verified claim seeds. Using SciTraj, we identify disciplinary siloing in typed citation flow and topic emergence concentrated in Vision and LLM-related work. The corpus also contains 287M typed trajectories of length $\geq 3$, covering 72.8% of papers, and supports a temporally split typed link-prediction benchmark. A year-shuffle falsifiability test separates temporal structure from year-correlated content, and a 3-annotator pilot reports $魏= 0.74$ with 79.9% precision.
Microsoft Research