Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Multi-LCB, a benchmark that extends the capabilities of LiveCodeBench (LCB) to evaluate large language models (LLMs) across twelve programming languages, addressing the original LCB's limitation of being restricted to Python. By transforming Python tasks into equivalent tasks in other languages while maintaining contamination controls, Multi-LCB enables a comprehensive assessment of LLMs' cross-language code generation abilities. The evaluation of 24 LLMs revealed significant issues such as Python overfitting and language-specific contamination, highlighting critical gaps in multilingual performance and the need for robust evaluation frameworks in software engineering tasks.
Python overfitting in LLMs is just the tip of the iceberg鈥擬ulti-LCB reveals substantial performance disparities across twelve programming languages.
LiveCodeBench (LCB) has recently become a widely adopted benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on code-generation tasks. By curating competitive programming problems, constantly adding fresh problems to the set, and filtering them by release dates, LCB provides contamination-aware evaluation and offers a holistic view of coding capability. However, LCB remains restricted to Python, leaving open the question of whether LLMs can generalize across the diverse programming languages required in real-world software engineering. We introduce Multi-LCB, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs across twelve programming languages, including Python. Multi-LCB transforms Python tasks from the LCB dataset into equivalent tasks in other languages while preserving LCB's contamination controls and evaluation protocol. Because it is fully compatible with the original LCB format, Multi-LCB will automatically track future LCB updates, enabling systematic assessment of cross-language code generation competence and requiring models to sustain performance well beyond Python. We evaluated 24 LLMs for instruction and reasoning on Multi-LCB, uncovering evidence of Python overfitting, language-specific contamination, and substantial disparities in multilingual performance. Our results establish Multi-LCB as a rigorous new benchmark for multi-programming-language code evaluation, directly addressing LCB's primary limitation and exposing critical gaps in current LLM capabilities.
