Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the concept of autotelic AI, where agents generate their own goals rather than merely pursuing designer-specified objectives. It highlights the implications of intrinsic motivation, resource-driven priors, and the necessity of embeddedness for achieving autotelic agency, ultimately revealing that the individuation of the agent leads to multiple valid self-partitions. The core challenge identified is not just goal generation, but the agent's ability to define and relativize its own identity in relation to those goals.
Autotelic AI reveals that the real challenge lies in how agents construct and understand their own identities, not just in generating goals.
Most artificial intelligence systems are built on the assumption that goals are exogenous and specified by the designer. Exploring what happens when an agent begins generating its own goals opens the field of autotelic AI. Agents are expected not merely to pursue objectives but to discover them. In this article, we trace its consequences through intrinsic motivation, resource-driven priors, causal-interventional learning, homeostasis, and embeddedness; the last of which is found to be a necessary but not sufficient condition for autotelic agency. Embeddedness individuates the agent at the cost of revealing that the individuation is non-unique, such that the same dynamics admit many valid partitions, each defining a different candidate self. The deepest problem with autotelic AI is therefore not how the agent generates goals, but how it generates and relativizes the self to which the goals are assigned. The agent must believe in its own boundary in order to act, and see through that boundary in order to understand. We consolidate these developments into a single framework and extend it along three directions: a quantum formulation in which the agent-environment cut becomes physical, a philosophical reading against non-dual contemplative traditions, and a concrete LLM-based agentic instantiation.
