Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study conducts a comprehensive trace-level measurement analysis of EVM workloads on Ethereum and Base, examining the stability of execution conditions and the implications of state drift on transaction outcomes. By analyzing 3,000 blocks per day, the authors reveal significant variability in resource consumption, with Base showing a higher reliance on cold storage reads and Ethereum's gas profile shifting towards compute-heavy patterns. The findings highlight the instability of gas estimates and storage access across different states, underscoring the need for multi-dimensional gas metering and better pricing strategies for persistent state growth.
Gas estimates can vary dramatically based on state conditions, with 46% of transactions on Base showing instability that complicates transaction predictability.
Gas metering on EVM-compatible blockchains assumes that execution conditions are stable: that the resource mix is constant enough to justify collapsing execution costs into a single scalar with fixed relative prices, and that state drift between submission and execution does not materially alter a transaction's outcome. We measure the extent to which this assumption fails. We present a trace-level measurement study of EVM workloads on Ethereum (L1) and Base (L2) throughout 2025, sampling 3,000 blocks per day per chain. We decompose each transaction into opcode-level execution gas, intrinsic gas, refunds, and persistent state deltas. To measure state sensitivity, we re-execute transactions from September 2025 on older states and record how gas usage and storage access patterns change. We find the resource mix to be far from stable: on Base, storage reads and compute account for 29.2% and 24.3% of execution gas, while Ethereum devotes 34.9% to storage writes. Ethereum's gas limit doubling during 2025 shifted its own profile toward compute-heavier, Base-like patterns. Base also exhibits a higher fraction of cold storage reads (49.7% versus 39.6% on Ethereum). Persistent state growth, a permanent cost priced as a transient one, reaches 456 GB on Base versus 38 GB on Ethereum. Execution outcomes are equally unstable: gas estimates vary across nearby historical states for 46.0% of transactions on Base, compared to 13.9% on Ethereum, with especially high sensitivity for MEV and DeFi activity. Storage access patterns also diverge across states, limiting the effectiveness of access lists and complicating parallel execution. Our work provides an empirical foundation for multi-dimensional gas metering and explicit pricing of state growth. They show that state-sensitive execution behavior complicates workload estimation, directly affecting transaction predictability and user experience.
