Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the challenges faced by grassroots organizations in engaging marginalized communities with AI policy development, emphasizing the importance of public participation for accountability. Through a case study of participatory design (PD) principles applied to AI policymaking for queer individuals in the US, the authors identify specific barriers that hinder effective engagement. Key findings include practical recommendations for policymakers to enhance inclusivity and representation in AI governance processes.
Marginalized communities face significant barriers in influencing AI policy, but actionable strategies can empower their voices in governance.
Public policies are being developed around the world to address privacy, economic, intellectual property, energy, and other risks that AI technologies pose. Involvement from the general public is essential to governance as an accountability and alignment mechanism. However, participating in and impacting policymaking can be challenging for sections of the public that lack extensive networks, lobbying capabilities, and other forms of power. This challenge is especially acute for marginalized communities. In this paper, we present a case study of our organization's efforts to bring participatory design (PD) principles to AI policymaking in the US. We describe our engagements with several US policy bodies, and our participatory development of AI policy for queer people. We highlight challenges with PD practice with marginalized communities, and offer suggestions to alleviate them. We conclude with actionable recommendations for policymakers and other organizers working in marginalized communities.
