Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper emphasizes the critical role of data standards in advancing humanoid robotics, arguing that effective data management is essential for accumulating physical experiences across various robots and tasks. The authors highlight three key insights: the necessity of preserving the relationships among robot body, action, and outcomes; the importance of physical coherence for multimodal data reuse; and the challenges posed by data scarcity and silos. By advocating for comprehensive humanoid robot data standards, the authors aim to enhance the interpretability, shareability, and reusability of embodied experiences, thereby laying the groundwork for more scalable Physical AI systems.
Humanoid robot data standards could unlock the full potential of physical AI by transforming isolated datasets into a cohesive, reusable resource for robotic learning and interaction.
The scalability of humanoid robots will depend not only on models and hardware, but also on whether physical experience can accumulate across robots, tasks, organizations, and time. Drawing on the authors' work in developing ISO/WD 26264-1, Humanoid robot datasets -- Part 1: General requirements, within ISO/TC 299/WG 16, this article argues that data standards are becoming foundational infrastructure for Physical AI. We develop three insights. First, humanoid robot data is embodied interaction data, not a collection of isolated digital samples; a useful dataset must preserve the relationship among robot body, action, task, scene, execution trace, and outcome. Second, its value depends on physical coherence: multimodal streams are reusable only when timing, coordinate frames, calibration, kinematics, units, and synchronization assumptions remain inspectable. Third, the main bottleneck is not only data scarcity, but non-cumulative data caused by high collection costs, data silos, and inconsistent evaluation. We argue that humanoid robot data standards address these bottlenecks by making embodied experience interpretable, shareable, traceable, and reusable. A general standard should provide horizontal infrastructure for lifecycle management, metadata, provenance, quality, versioning, and traceability, while capability-specific parts should define domain grammar for manipulation, locomotion, human-robot interaction, cognition, and future humanoid capabilities. As AI moves from screens into bodies, data standards must evolve from organizing digital information to structuring physical interaction.
Tsinghua AI