Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel Bell-state extension of the Loop-Back quantum key distribution (QKD) architecture that enables secure key establishment between two passive users without the need for quantum detectors. By leveraging a single active station, Alice, who retains one qubit of a Bell pair and sends the other through two passive users, the protocol allows Alice to determine the effective composition of local Pauli operations applied by the users while keeping their individual choices hidden. The key finding is that this approach enhances the efficiency of passive-user QKD by shifting the limitation from post-selection in single-qubit schemes to the success probability of Bell-state measurements, thereby improving security against potential attacks.
Passive users can securely establish keys without quantum detectors, relying solely on a single active station's entangled-state infrastructure.
We propose and analyze a Bell-state extension of the Loop-Back quantum key distribution architecture for secret-key establishment between two passive users that do not require quantum transmitters or quantum detectors. In the proposed setting, a single active station, Alice, provides the entangled-state infrastructure, retains one qubit of an initially prepared Bell pair, and sends the traveling subsystem through two passive users, denoted by $B_1$ and $B_2$. Each passive user applies a local Pauli operation to the same traveling subsystem, so that the operation observed by Alice is only the effective composition $U_{\mathrm{eff}}=U_2U_1$. After the subsystem returns, Alice performs a Bell-state measurement and, using her private knowledge of the initial Bell state, deterministically identifies the effective Pauli operation. However, the individual factors $U_1$ and $U_2$ remain algebraically hidden from Alice whenever the local choices are uniformly and independently selected. The public effective operation acts as a parity-like constraint: each passive user can infer the operation applied by the other from its own private choice, while the active station learns only the global composition. This construction transfers the essential distributed-transformation mechanism of passive-user Loop-Back QKD to the entangled-state regime. Unlike single-qubit passive-user schemes, whose useful events are intrinsically post-selected, the Bell-state version is limited primarily by the success probability of the Bell-state measurement. We discuss the algebraic structure of the protocol, its interpretation as an infrastructure-assisted mediated key-establishment mechanism, and the physical assumptions required to protect passive Pauli modulators against active injection or Trojan-horse-type attacks.
